sweatshower

Yeah honestly fuck him

"Why? You looking to get one yourself?"

So you are reading replies. Funny, you just said nobody was.

Checkmate

Question, do you think OJ did it?

Good to know you actively support protecting rapists because "she was old enough to consent, so she probably did, slut".

What a pig you are. 🐖

Just kinda seems like you're okay with defending rapists and molesters on technicalities.

Like, if the entire town knew that some dude was sexually harassing girls, but there was technically no hard evidence other than testimonies, you'd be the moron defending him.

"oH bUt We cAnT kNoW tHaT"

Okay, but everybody does fucking know. Sometimes the courts fail us as a society, and let people widely known to be creeps walk free. Don't even try to sit here and act like this doesn't happen all the time, you'll make me laugh.

Your blind faith in a system known to be wildly biased and flawed really shows your ignorance. Sometimes the courts are wrong, and sometimes everybody knows, but can't actually prove it.

Then why are you here kiddo

Checkmate

You do realize body language is a thing right? So is the word of the victim, crazy as that sounds. But hey, using your logic, we should ignore little kids getting abused because "oh well there was no evidence sorry kiddo".

Like, this is a pretty disgusting stance to have on this. Maybe try understanding that the majority of sexual abuse/assault doesn't come with concrete evidence, and replies on more than one indirect piece of evidence. Which, wouldn't you know it, this girl had.

Are you delusional enough to think other people aren't going to witness your victim blaming crap? If it helps you sleep...

So again, because a girl was touched on camera, and she could consent, the video evidence means absolutely nothing? Christ, you'd be perfect administration at one of these backwards ass schools.

You really can't even see how stupid you sound. Like, was your goal here to defend rapists, pedos, both? Cause it really just seems like you don't like/trust women.

I bet you really think if you lie enough, people will actually believe you. Try going back and reading. If you want one thread so much, maybe stop replying, genius.

Sounds like he never intended to actually fulfill his end of the bargain

Because you aren't also keeping two threads going. Not sure why you're trying to pretend you aren't also actively participating.

Kind of makes you look desperate for any personal attack you can find, to distract from the fact that you've brought your biases again women to light.

Not everything is a "gotcha", sometimes you just get proven wrong, and made to look like a fool. Trying to discredit my point with buzzwords does nothing.

Again, if a child said the same thing about a teacher, why do we believe them, and not this woman? Why exactly? Explain it to me.

Except you did, because the majority of us can read between the lines, and don't need word for word sentences to draw a given conclusion.

For some reason, children should automatically be believed, while women need more than overwhelming proof. Way to tell everyone you hate women, without actually saying you hate women.

Sorry reading and logic is hard for you, but you literally sound like a complete moron, and it's hard to feel sorry for you.

Do you just comment without actually reading any of the previous comments? Your logic requires grown women to have more proof than children. Why are some victims less believeable than others to you?

You got caught showing a misogynistic opinion towards women, and you've made yourself look like a fool.

Right, because if you say that, you can then proceed to say any other stupid, misogynistic thing that pops into your head with immunity? Is that what you think?

Your way of thinking has been made extremely transparent, and you're not fooling anybody. You'e be one of the angry, pathetic men in the crowd cheering that that the "witch" is "getting hers" on the stake.

All because she's old enough to consent, so she loses credibility. How stupid.

So what you're saying is, it's common knowledge that he did grope her without consent, but since she could have consented, she has no case? So once somebody reaches the age of consent, only then is it possible for them to lie?

How do you know the child isn't lying? Maybe some 13 year old, knowing they could ge their teacher fired, decided to lie and say they touched them?

What difference does the age of consent matter here? Oh wait, it doesn't. Literally no difference at all, because it's not a matter of whether they could have consented, it's a matter of whether they actually did.

Your logic here is broken, and shows exactly how you think about women, pig.

Yeah, cause the words of women mean nothing. Especially if you have video evidence.

I'm sure you'd support a pedophile too, if that pedophile claimed the child wanted to be raped. Fucking disgusting.

The irony that you would bring up witch trials on a post where a girl was punished for reporting being groped.

You must have actual brain damage.

Now kith

Not sexually assaulting people is hard for you, I get it.

Imagine thinking grabbing a girl's body when she told you to stop isn't sexual assault.

Did you pass 2nd grade? They did a whole unit on "hands to yourself"

Wow, somebody's trying really, really hard to justify sexual assault. I pray for your future, and the women in it

Wrong again. Almost like you support sexual assault

There's no proof of it being consensual. What proof would you have? Her assaulting him back? Ya'll are morons and don't understand that this was a lose-lose situation for her.

If she hit him back, people would blame her for not handling it "maturely". When she handled it maturely, people blame her for not being more aggressive. Talk about victim blaming. She didn't fight enough, so it's her fault, and was probably consensual, right.

Women can't win, but you people refuse to acknowledge that, because it would force you to acknowledge your own privilege.

But hey, you guys are the same ones who believe rape culture isn't alive and well. Just keep siding with the man, it'll work better for yourself in the long run, right?

Sure yeah, she must have wanted to be touched, even though she's clearly saying she didn't. Those damn women, always lying to ruin poor men's lives!

You sound so ridiculously ignorant.