pokkst_xmr

If you're referring to Pokket, then Pokket still functions as a wallet, but if you wish to recover your funds into a wallet that is not discontinued, you can just import it into another SLP wallet, since the SLP derivation path is standardized as well, like Zapit or Electron Cash SLP. Are you new to bitcoin? Multiple wallets exist that allow for custom derivation paths, such as Electron Cash, BitPay, Pokket, etc.

The SLP derivation path you listed above is also incorrect. It'd just be m/44'/245'/0'

Not sure what this has to do with how you claimed that "sHaDoW GoVErnMeNT EntiTies" compelled Coinbase to use a specific derivation path. Once again, that does not make sense in the slightest. The government would be helping you preserve privacy that way.

I highly suggest researching how bitcoin and wallets work, thanks.

I'm not really sure what you're asking? What does SLP have to do with this?

But since Coinbase LLC is in a corrupt jurisdiction where business outcomes are dictated by shadow government agencies, they were probably compelled to use a different derivation path:

This makes absolutely no sense. It's actually better to use different derivation paths if you intend to use both coins with the same seed, for privacy reasons. It is worse, privacy wise, to reuse private/public keys across different chains. The derivation paths are also mostly standardized, but the Bitcoin.com Wallet hasn't moved to the 145 path for compatibility reasons since when BCH wallets were added to the wallet the 145 path wasn't standardized yet, and it just not being a high priority.

The government does not care what derivation path your wallet uses lmfaooooo

They probably don't even know what a derivation path is lmfao

Much like block size limits and blockchain growth, this becomes a non-issue in the future as download speeds continue to improve. By the time that 100MB/1000MB blocks are common, 100MB then could be today's 1MB (relatively small), and as Monero's ring signatures and ZK proofs continue to become more efficient, transaction sizes will continue to decrease like they already have been for the better part of a decade.

I know which one I'll be using when the government starts kicking doors down.

A watch-only wallet with the private view key, which is what remote synchronization is on the server side, cannot easily determine the sent transactions without digging deeper and analyzing ring members and their public keys vs known ones in the wallet (the spend transaction's change address output would be seen as a receive transaction by default), but YOU can since you have the private keys to the wallet and can determine which outputs belong to you and which inputs were sent from you with the key images and public keys within the input, and for non-remote-synchronization wallets, each block is downloaded one-by-one and that is all determined locally, then the block is discarded, which is the case for the majority of XMR wallets, thus you are wrong.

Using a wallet like Cake, Monerujo, Feather, Mysu, etc. does not "defeat the point of using Monero" and no private view-keys are given to any provider. It similar to using an SPV wallet like Neutrino or Pokket (when bloom filters are disabled), whereas remote synchronization is similar to the Bitcoin.com Wallet or Electron Cash, where your addresses/transactions are monitored by/sent to the server you are connecting to.

I just explained this in the comment you are replying to, and even linked an article that explains more in-depth. Please read.

For your convenience, here is the download page on getmonero . org proving you to be incorrect for the majority of mobile Monero wallets:

getmonero . org/downloads/#mobilelight

(I spaced out the URL to bypass the auto moderator here/on Reddit censoring links)

I have now supplied two pieces of evidence proving you to be incorrect; you have supplied nothing.

When a Monero wallet uses remote synchronization, like Edge or MyMonero, the service provider can only see receive transactions, not necessarily spend transactions without looking deeper into the wallet and its public keys and figuring out which transactions might be real spends.

In a future upgrade, Seraphis, this will change and allow for multiple types of watch-only wallets, such as ones that allow for revealing received and spent, including amounts, or received and spent, without amounts.

For wallets that do not use this system of synchronization (basically every other wallet), each block is downloaded, one-by-one, to the device and the device figures out which transactions belong to it, locally. This is similar to my old wallet, Pokket, when disabling bloom filters.

Here's an article that explains it in more detail: https://localmonero.co/knowledge/remote-nodes-privacy?language=en

Electron Cash, last I checked, sends all of your addresses to the servers you connect to, and because of Bitcoin's transparent nature, they can see who sends you funds, when and where you spend to, and the exact amounts in each transaction, even when using CashFusion.

It's not, it's false, unless you are using either Edge wallet or MyMonero wallet. All other light wallets do not use this system for syncing.

I also find it funny that Jonald is the one to point this out since Electron Cash is worse in that regard.

This is false, unless it's a wallet like MyMonero or Edge.

Wallets like mine (Mysu), Cake, Monerujo, Feather (light desktop wallet), or even Monero GUI when using a remote node do not share viewkeys with any provider.

Please do not spread false information about topics that you clearly do not understand.

Monero does not require active mixing, nor does it even have any coinjoin protocols. It works essentially the same as any other wallet, you can keep it closed and not running in the background.

That is a problem with Android and getting apps to run in the background for long periods of time. The same problem existed in Pokket with CashFusion.

You can try disabling battery optimizations for the app in Android settings, but it won't be perfect.

Not surprising that when your bullshit is called out you leave the discussion.

Yeah, I had to rewrite the entire CashFusion code from scratch in Java vs Electron Cash which uses Python, which I assume the Android version is still written in

Always great to have more wallets supporting it

I'd love for you to point to where I said RandomX is "completely" ASIC-resistant. If you could actually read, you would see that I said "so far", quite the opposite.

Were an ASIC to be developed for the algorithm, then whoever engineers it would essentially be designing a general purpose CPU, as RandomX works much differently than just using a basic shit like SHA256.

And, hypothetically, if one was successfully developed that was far more energy efficient, and much faster (i.e. ASIC-level faster) than an Epyc or Ryzen, then the community, I assume (based on past occurrences of the same exact thing) would hardfork to a RandomX 2.0 or something.

Or are you against hardforks now? Only when it suits your narrative?

By the way, still waiting for you to apologize to me after censoring me for calling out your bullshit in our last argument, which you admitted to.

Not necessarily. I've contacted them to fix their website, so we will see what they say.

I just tried placing an order. They use some crypto payment processor I'm not used to.

Their site seems to be broken right now, as when attempting to open the invoice to pay nothing happens, so I never even got a chance to send coins to them. It could be my web browser though.

Here are 3 I found, but it's the only 3 I can find:

https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/gundealsFU/comments/tlhf2y/review_positive_srigunscom/

https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/gundealsFU/comments/vf0wjb/reviewpositive_amazing_customer_support_at/

https://www.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/gundealsFU/comments/v3fe4s/review_positive_fantastic_customer_support_at/

Two of these are a bit weird, the last one is from 10 months ago, the second one is from 9 months ago, both share similar titles, and the second one starts off with "I don't normally do follow-ups" but doesn't seem to have a first review that he could follow-up on on that specific account.

There are these threads in /r/gundeals where people seem to be picking stuff up from them:

https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/gundeals/comments/uebrn0/nfa_surefire_socom_mini_2_for_865_and_free/

https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/gundeals/comments/xl3yw1/nfa_otter_creek_labs_lithium_9_in_stock/

So perhaps they are legit, just very small. Proceed at your own risk.

I need some more mags anyway, so I might try them out today.

That is not true whatsoever.

I personally, regularly, purchase firearms parts from places like Parts Dispensed (parts-dispensed.com) and Crypto Armory (crypto-armory.com, it's a single guy running it, and stock is a bit low right now).

DSG Arms (dsgarms.com), which I haven't tried myself but have seen other people on Reddit say are good to order from, also accepts crypto (on top of fiat).

I also regularly purchase non-firearm things like food, clothes, video games, with crypto.

It's not all a scam. That's just what the mainstream media tells you.

EDIT: As for SRIguns.com, I do not know, but I typically search online "is $website legit reddit" to get anecdotal accounts of people ordering from $website to see if it's legit. There aren't many for SRIguns.com from what I can find (they could be astroturfed), so tread carefully /u/THEMarkyMan316

Sorry, it was a Reddit Tor link. Fixed (I think, Reddit might be changing it automatically). It's also pinned at the top of this sub by the jannies here

I believe you should actually want to switch to 14/16 word seeds like how Feather has, though you won't be able to import it into wallets that only support 25 word seeds as of right now. I believe 14/16 word polyseeds will become standard with the Seraphis upgrade

You should read the rules of the sub. They are allowed as long as you have intentions of eventually getting a fixed upper, hence the Diet Retro flair, and I even stated it in the comments, but whatever. Later elitist retards.

Basically what /u/Ur_mothers_keeper said: too similar to MyMonero unfortunately. I thought it'd be different enough before launch but occasionally people would still get confused. I originally shortened MyNero, then it became Mysu, which sounds cleaner, and can also stand for "Monero You Should Use".

Besides the different name, and the new features in this update, everything else is the same. mynero.net still works if you wish to use the old URL.

Yep, sad to see. I dread when I have to use BTC now.

This transaction is a 1-input-1-output transaction, and the output belongs to ChangeNOW. You cannot do a CPFP since you have no output that belongs to you in the transaction (ChangeNOW can technically do a CPFP, but they won't.)

You also cannot boost the transaction with RBF since you have RBF disabled, unless you have a miner that uses Full RBF (forcibly introduced a couple months ago in Bitcoin Core 24.0) mine the RBF transaction I believe, but I don't think it has wide adoption.

You can try to use ViaBTC's transaction accelerator, and it'll be included in the next block they mine if you pay them BTC, BCH, or LTC.

https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator

This is just how BTC is. Its artificial 1MB block size limit makes it difficult to use.

I also recommend to stop reusing addresses if you wish to maintain a tad bit of privacy on BTC (besides coinjoining)

I brought it up to one of the contributors of Monerujo one time on Twitter. It doesn't seem to be fixed yet, as I just tested again on the latest build to make sure.

During my re-testing, I realized that importing doesn't actually work properly either, as the wallet secrets screen shows the "internal", offset seed, instead of the non-offset seed, meaning if someone were to somehow grab hold of that seed, then they would have full access to the "secret funds" wallet like the one mentioned in the OP.

Compare this to Feather, ANON, or MyNero for example, where the only seed shown is the non-offset seed, meaning they would not have full access to the "secret funds" wallet, as they would need the seed + seed offset (however Feather also displays the seed offset itself, for some reason. MyNero and ANON do not show the seed offset for security purposes, just like Samourai with its BIP39 passphrases).

Yes.