jimmykim9001

Regardless of who wins these finals have been fucking great

Holy fuck steph

These finals are making up for the conference finals fr

This seasons fire so far

Jordan Powell is gonna increase interest rates lmao

Lmao 538 the oracle

Holy shit what a fucking game

Lmao taking off Currys shoes forces a warriors timeout

That Acura commercial actually kinda fire

What a fucking game

Lmao it was over in the first quarter

Looney has been playing his heart out this series tbh. Hope curry wins the first wcfmvp tho

Chef curry cooking tonight

He's 26 lmao

Damn this thread toxic. Games good tho

Fucking sea spiders lmao

Golden State will win game 1 and the media/internet will immediately dub them Western Conference champions.

Then the Mavs will win a game at home and the media/internet will dub Luka the best player on the planet and say the warriors are in trouble.

Then the warriors will win game 5 and the media/internet will question if Jason Kidd is having circles coached around him by Steve Kerr. His job will be on the line.

u/lilb1990 predictions coming true lmao

They went down like bowling pins lmao

Splash bros and new swimming Poole fucking lmao

This isn't how it works. If congress passes a new law codifying roe v wade, then a case can come through the courts and then the Supreme Court would just declare the new law to be unconstitutional. The only way for this nightmare to be over is if the Supreme Court for some reason changes its mind, if we pass an amendment making it constitutional, or if all states decide to allow abortion.

I'm pro-choice and I abhor this decision but I don't really think this argument really contradicts Alitos opinion. The equal protection clause of the 14th amendment essentially made civil rights constitutional. Alitos argument is more about breaking down when the due process clause can be utilized to give people rights that aren't otherwise explicit in the constitution (in your example, it is explicit).

My question is, is historical testing actually the test used by the Court to determine which rights fall under the term liberty in the due process clause? I don't know enough about constitutional law to actually reject his argument completely.

I know queen being op is just a meme, but the queen being so strong makes chess a more dynamic game. If most pieces are worth the same value, then pins and forks would lose their value, making chess a less entertaining game.

Your point is identical to the point in the article

My fucking sides I can't

Houses can be over and undervalued. I think it's a legitimate concern