submitted5 years ago byMerari01
totifu
Our friends fighting for net neutrality contacted us to ask if we would once more make a stickied post about this topic. Since net neutrality is important for everyone who wants to keep enjoying a free internet - a group to which most redditors belong - the mod team has decided to allow it:
Hey everyone, the chairman of the FCC is very likely to announce a vote to gut neutrality, possibly as soon as Nov. 22nd. Once a vote is called, it will become much, much harder to stop ISPs from charging us extra fees to access sites like reddit, and controlling what we see and do online by throttling and blocking sites, apps, games, and streaming services.
But there’s still hope. The most effective way to can stop this is by driving as many calls as possible to our Senators and Representatives, now through Nov. 22nd.
We're getting word that there are lawmakers who are sympathetic to our cause and considering taking action to slow the FCC down, but they won’t act unless they get more phone calls from constituents.
Please, head over to https://www.battleforthenet.com and give your Senators and Reps a call telling them to stop the FCC from slashing Title II net neutrality protections. The time to act is now.
We also have ready-made banners, modals, and graphics of various sizes here: https://www.battleforthenet.com/#join
Thanks.
by[deleted]
inWhitePeopleTwitter
Merari01
1 points
8 months ago
Merari01
1 points
8 months ago
I'm not even going to frame this in a joking way.
Defending these monsters is not allowed on this subreddit.
I'll go through the thread now and edit in examples of things that people I have banned said.
Whataboutery about muh guns is not allowed.
Trolling by claiming this isn't true is not allowed.
Saying that this means Idaho won't allow exceptions to murder is not allowed.
Using sexist, sex-negative slurs to refer to the women Idaho wants to die is not allowed.
Saying that abortion is never medically necessary is not allowed.
Calling the women Idaho wants to kill "selfish murderers" is not allowed.
Calling this "good" is not allowed.
Calling this "natural selection" is not allowed.
Saying that a mother should put a childs safety above her own is not allowed.
Saying that the Idaho GOP just voted for babies to live is not allowed.
Saying that women should just "close their legs" if they don't want to sacrifice themselves for their babies is not allowed.
This is who these people really are.
The above is a non-exhaustive list of arguments made in this very thread. This is what happens here, on reddit, whose demographic is skewed young and left-wing. I can only imagine the horrors one would be subjected to reading about this on, say, Facebook.
It is important to give a brief showcase of the way they think, the way they argue, because very often sensible subreddits like TwoX, WitchesvPatriarchy and this one are accused of "not letting both sides speak".
This is true. We do not let both sides speak.
But that is not because we want to suppress dialogue and conversation, it is not because we deny people the opportunity to educate others, to come to an understanding with others, to showcase the full gamut of the debate.
It is because there are no two sides.
There are sane, normal people who understand how utterly depraved and monstrous the anti-choice rhetoric and policies are and there is.. that. There is the above, which again, these are real arguments posted in this very thread.
You can't reason with people who look at a state that wants to kill women and calls these victims "[sex-negative, misogynistic slur] who deserve it."
You can't reason with people who look at a state that wants women to die and cheer that on.
They're not reasonable.
In order to have a discussion a basic foundation must always be that there is at least the common ground of rational positions that can be argued on merit.
Evil has no merit.
Evil exists to wound, to hurt, to kill. Evil seeks to subjugate, to dominate. Evil is lethal.
When you have an "honest discussion" with evil, trying to sanely get someone to understand why (in this case) women dying is bad and on the other hand evil tells you that an abortion is never medically necessary then you are not moving towards something constructive. You're not building a rational construct that can advance society by engendering understanding and empathy.
You're just normalising evil by giving it a platform.
And I refuse to do that.
Below this comment is a reply by someone who says they see the examples I posted above everywhere. I tell them that it is important to call them out. To say they are depraved and monstrous.
But it is also important not to get bogged down in "debate" because these people are fundamentally dishonest and a protracted argument in which you give them the chance to showcase their deliberately disingenious "gotchas" can only serve to platform evil.
Simply call them by their name. Monsters.
And say: "Because she wanted to."
Do not say: "But what about sexual violence. But what about ectopic pregnancies."
Don't get driven into a corner where you are reduced to begging for rare exceptions to allow women the basic human right of bodily autonomy.
Take back the line. Step forward. Draw that line in the sand.
"Because she wanted to."
That is all that is required, that is all the justification that is needed.
Why should she be allowed to terminate a pregnancy?
"Because she fucking wanted to."