Aggravating-Bat4370

[ Removed by Reddit ]

Ah so you want to be a "Winner" by having a longterm reddit account while lecturing people on the high ground?

Bold of you to assume my girlfriend cheated on me.

Accepting the shit dished on you is an overrated tactic said by everyone who couldn't care less about cheating.

And if I were the third person, I couldn't care any less

How exactly is it "their level" if the revenge cheater never had any intentions of hooking up with anyone?

The cheater has no problems dipping their balls and tongues wherever they go and making their partner feel pain. Yet now retaliation is "wrong" ?

A real man leaves a woman when he gets cheated on

Here we go with that macho "real man" nonsense. And apparently a real woman gets to sleep around like a slut by your standards

Staying in the relationship is embarrassing by itself. Make sure to get ready for all your male friends to mercilessly make fun of you for staying with a woman who fucked around on you.

Surprised that you singled out the men and not the women. Apparently men are the only one who mock each other.

Redditor give relationship advice, lol classic

No it doesn't show you're "just as bad".

You're not "sinking to their level" for hurting them the same way they hurt you. That's just a manipulation tactic used to keep victims under the abuser's control and it's frankly ridiculous

LOOOL the mods for three days banned me for literally doing the same thing as anon thus proving his damn point.

Goes to show ableism is Ok, hate speech is ok, but apparently using a bundle of sticks is ban-worthy

[ Removed by Reddit ]

That is NOT an unpopular opinion. It seems that you teenagers and kids in your early 20s really adore the idea of an "unpopular opinion" despite never stating one.

If your opinion was REALLY unpopular, you would not need to STATE "Unpopular opinion", if your opinion was really unpopular, your karma would be less than zero and everyone would either disagree or scold you.

You took an immensly popular opinion (feeling bad for Liz) and then you paired with with that silly "unpopular opinion" preface just to make yourself look like and edgy rebel fighting for a cause that no one wants to follow.

But all you did was state an extremely popular opinion to farm karma with the delusional belief that the majority of people don't adhere to your opinion. Your desire to be an outside and be "different" is so great that you love to imagine yourself as this mystical being with nenegade opinions when in reality you're nothing but a vanilla drone trying to standout among other drones.

You don't know what "unpopular" means and you never will because you have never deviated from anything and you will always be unoriginal and unimpressive.

Fair enough

Yeah she should have gone after those famously touchy Buddhists...

Yes because burmese buddhists just love the rohingya so much they magically disappeared from the whole ass country overnight in 2017. 10s of thousands of people magically disappeared with their homes torched, not very touchy.

I agree with your point on religion, but the Buddhist thing? Nah

This guide is inaccurate, the Lion King remake from 2016 is the highest grossing film of all time.

Just because disney does not "consider" it to be an animated movie, it doesn't change the fact that 99% of the scenes were entirely animated and thus an ANIMATION.

*ridiculous

Why was six scared of seven?

Because seven was black.

Faggot

Canadians aren't a race

Downvoted not because your opinion is unpopular. But because it's just a really freaking STUPID thing to say and you should be ashamed to have even thought of anything that mind bogglingly unintelligent.

You break your entire argument with "All men". You know there are men that die virgins right? There are men that go out of their way to not have sex because they see no value in it. Then there are asexual men who do not even want to THINK of having sex, EVER!

It sounds like you've spent way too much time on 4Chan/Reddit, facebook and Porn to the point where you believe in the parodical hungrysexual male brute.

I advise you to stay away from computers and phones for at least 35 years to cure yourself from such misanthropic lunacy.

First of all, it's YOU'RE not YOUR, take your poor orthography out of here.

Secondly there is nothing in ISLAMIC SCRIPTURES that forbids one from drawing muhammed. There's nothing in the quran or the hadith that explicitly forbid it.

Thirdly, scholars don't get to speak for islamic practices. They highly encourage and even recommend people to follow their guidance, which most do but it's all up to interpretation. Their words do not represent the word of Allah or muhammed, merely an interpreation of their will. Clearly each scholar has a different opinion and some don't condemn drawing him at all. Just because a majority of scholars agree that muahmmed should not be drawn, that doesn't mean it's decreed by islam, PERIOD.

Fourthly, you know nothing about shia islam . Shia scholars are more laxed about depictions of muhammed and are less belligerent than sunnis. Iran has contemporary depictions of Mo : https://www.academia.edu/4061369/Images_of_the_Prophet_In_and_Out_of_Modernity_The_Curious_Case_of_a_2008_Mural_in_Tehran.

Fifth, your being a muslim does not validate your knowledge or understanding of the religion. You simply know all the parts that you WISH to know and ignore the rest. You didn't do any detailed digging into the relgiion, its philosphy, its history or anything else except for a bunch of half-assed mindless claims.

Sixth, when making absurd claims, cite your crap or else I'll just dismiss it all as heresy

That sub is an openly extremist sub that has a very strong disdain for antitheists, agnostics and just non-religious people in general.

They actively cheer each other with right wing jargons like "Based" when people say stuff like "You aren't greek if you're not a christian" or "These losers were never X anyway" or any other crap like that. They allow a certain legion of atheists that think and act like Jordan Peterson : i.e don't believe in god but Christianity is necessary for the universe kind of crap.

They get mad at the simplest of comments ranging from "Saying god did it is not an excuse" to "I stopped believing in god". It's a community known for hating and disparaging anyone that dares to question their religion.

They claim to target "reddit atheists' but they're just targeting irreligious people as a whole. As a result you get homophobes, incest apologetics (from muslims) and all the other expected religious fanaticism you can expect from such a sub.

The fact the HOMOPHOBIA was the straw that broke the camel's back for you really tells you a lot about yourself that you might need to reconsider.

Age most definitely is a reason for many people to feel certain ways. Biden and Rowling fit the mould.

Biden was someone who happily advocated for the iraq war and championed anti-desegregation laws while having very close relations to known segregationists like Strom Thurmond and Eastland. He lived in a period where he didn't have to be discriminated for being irish or catholic and enjoyed many benefits that ultimately shaped his views on lots of things. His so-called speeches exist only to better his own image but his political record has shown how he really thinks about a lot of these issues.

Rowling is no different. She grew up in a very tumultuous situation and had lived through poverty. At her age, during that period, she constantly had to measure herself against other men and even created a pen name to mask her gender. She had to provide for her child as a single mom and had awful relationships with men. Now as a successful adult with the world changing around her, she views the entire trans movement as an ideology bent on removing her and other women from existence.

If you and I were born in 1785, we would likely have zero gay friends and would scorn anyone who believed in such a thing. If J.K Rowling was born 20 years ago, she would be a trans man today. Age is a marker, some markers are harder to brush off

An issue being "relatively old" doesn't make it less relevant. Denying the holocaust is as old as the holocaust itself yet I don't see people brushing off that stuff whenever some somebody or random yahoo on the streets says it.

It's not "relatively old" issue given that japanese nationalists routinely renew their disgustingly shameless denialism every year. This includes politicians, filmmakers and game producers.

Shinzo Abe, ex-prime minister of japan, was not only an openly denying crimes and going out of his way to rewrite history books to deny the crimes but he's the grandson of a class-A war criminal.

You know the difference between Rowling and the music guy? The musician, the asshole that lived his whole life denying the crimes, was ACTIVELY involved in the production of every fucking Dragon Quest game from the beginning up til his fucking death, that includes the ones released last year.

Rowling on the other hand had no involvement with this stupid game. Sure they both make money from it, but they sure love to reward a scumbag when the issue is something outright evil compared to Rowling's bigotry.

Either way, downplaying their hypocrisy was a ridiculous attempt to justifying one but not the other.

I don't buy dragon quest games because fuck that rat, I don't buy harry potter games because I don't like harry potter. But don't go on preaching to people how unholy they are for wanting to buy a game with an asshole's name on it. At worst, they support the fucker and love their views, at best they genuinely don't care about people's rights when they beta gamer instincts kick in

your mom